I play horrible games I’ve been totally bummed recently with my gaming experience. I received two games recently through Gamefly and I can definitively say the both suck ass. Both a new and older game. Equally sucking.
Kane and Lynch, has had a ton controversy around it due to the firing of the reviewer who ripped the game on Gamespot. I decided that I would judge it for myself.
At first glance it looked like the kind of game that I would like to play. Violence, guns, bad language and things generally in bad taste.
I knew in the first 15 minutes of playing this game hat it deserved whatever harsh criticism that lead to Gerstmanngate. I read the review that got the guy fired and I agree with most of it. It’s basically unplayable at some parts. Literally, at one point I got stuck in a wall and the game just glitched out on me. The gameplay is clunky, the movements and aiming are awkward. It reminded me of a bad version of a game I really do like, “The Getaway.” When companies are making millions of dollars on games, this type of shotty mess is unacceptable. It seems fair to me that if you make a horrible game, it will get terrible reviews, and people won't buy the crap, they lose thousands of dollars. Economics 101
I also don't necesarily agree with one popular website review which said "Stylish action, terrific boss fights, and beautiful, melodramatic cutscenes will inspire you to push forward, and they serve as an appropriate reward for a well-played sequence of demon slaying."
Does it even matter since they have already shown a commitment to sell games rather than actually review them?
Well, next post I promise to tell you about a game that I really did like!
Yeah, but no, these two games sucked. I'm sure there will be people who like DMC 4 but I know i didn't.


1 comments:
Devil May Cry 4 was a horrible dissapointment. They tried that new main character crap with Metal Gear Solid. If it didn't work for Konami, then what made Capcom think they could do it any better?
Post a Comment